Sylvia Plath was a poet & anyone familiar with her story know that it's widely accepted that her husband, poet & Knight Ted Hughes who, after her death profited & gained a knighthood due to editing Plath's work. Anyone familiar with Plath knew that she was being abused and gas lighted by her husband, nobody did anything to intervene. Plath was pushed to the point of breaking and then suicide, the public world branded her as being "crazy" and "unstable" but the work is now no longer edited to hide the truth.
Check out the Literary Hub review of her life & current editions of her work.
Change. org - Judge Tim Sulak has a lengthy history of conducting himself in a dishonest and discriminatory manner. Additionally, he has engaged in a pattern of discrimination against vulnerable parents in a manner that puts domestic violence survivors and their children at risk for abuse. Judge Sulak has repeatedly ignored the abuse dynamic in cases before him and has demonstrated a willingness to engaged in ex parte communication and receive ex parte evidence to justify his actions.
In one case, a mother was raped by her abusive ex-partner after Judge Tim Sulak declined to recognize an out of state protective order. In another case, Judge Tim Sulak expressly stated from the bench that addressing gender discrimination in cases before him was outside of his jurisdiction. In yet another case, Judge Tim Sulak told a mother that if her child made an outcry of abuse during his interview with the child, he would just assume that the mother was coaching the child.
This type of behavior simply cannot be tolerated from a member of our prestigious judiciary. Please join us by signing our Petition to Impeach Judge Tim Sulak, and let your state Representative know that Texas still cares about judicial integrity.
What makes a parent run? An abusive and systematic family history of covering up sexual abuse by family members? Socially accepted bias of anti female beliefs that people use on a daily basis to justify; objectifying people, excuse rape and abuse? A family law system that accepts federal funding from TANF (temporary aid for needy families) & Social Security block grants and bonuses for having a "healthy" child support system, yet the perception is that federal protections for Constitutional Rights have no place in that federally funded family court. Rights that are normally taken from Fit Parents are; freedom of speech (including the ability to file a complaint against a court appointed party in violation of their licensing rules, due process and equal protection under the law. Getting a fair trail under these rules, within a self regulated industry is difficult.
Defense & explanation for posting -
All data presented here is from official sources such as; court transcripts, psychological evaluations, the family law record and more. We are taking this step because Mr. Allen had somehow acquired mail that went to Ms. Llorens personal post office box in Feb of 2017, approximately 190 miles away from his city of residence (per court records). The letter was then faxed to Ms. Llorens' parole officer 120 days later, which happens to be the actual day of the deadline to submit an additional application for benefits(not included in the fax). To put this in perspective the divorce was final Dec 2000, and he’s still potentially breaking laws to financially cripple Ms. Llorens by severely limiting her ability to move on and establish a residence and a life. Being formerly (incarcerated) makes that difficult Mr. Allen is aware of those disabilities as he provides those details to the police and FBI to aid in appending her from the 2002 - 2014 time frame they went missing. Ms. Llorens was born to an Army Green Beret pilot (Mexican born) who had come into contact with Agent Orange, and due to the birth defect cerebral palsy she had received disability until her mid 20's, Ms. Llorens had then has melanoma & surgery, her pregnancy was rough, she had almost lost the baby and was put on bed rest and induced 2 weeks early. Mr. Allen then had then driven the couple into a stopped car causing a multiple vehicle accident in a construction zone when the child was 3/4 months old, he hadn't waited for Llorens or the baby to be strapped in after a diaper change upon taking off, as he was irritated at having to come so far to finally see her family (4 hours). The baby was just buckled into her seat and impact occurred before Ms. Llorens was strapped into her seat. Llorens was hospitalized, with injuries to her mouth (teeth & jaw), cracked ribs and her back. She does take responsibility for what's she done and she knew the potential price when she ran. And that's only 1 story...
Let’s shed some light on what statements were made to the media vs what was testified to;
Mr. Allen, during an interview upon Llorens return to the US stated that “she was not living a regular life, she has not been going to the school.” yet during testimony given March 28th 2016 Allen indicated that he had spoken to the child’s teacher in elementary school (in 2003) and he had been ordered to stand down by the FBI, instead of going to the school where the child currently was enrolled in (during another attempt at capture). It was also established that after the child had entered school in the US she had graduated on time (due to her talent, sheer will and an intelligence) and is currently excelling in her chosen career path. Mr. Allen then testifies again that he and his current wife had also interviewed teachers throughout the 12 years after a successful escapes made by Ms. Llorens. The step mother then testifies to allowing the 17 year old to drink along with Dr. Bailey's husband to celebrate just days after her recovery, she was 17 and this was apparently part of the reunification therapy that children typically go through.
During the psychological evaluations given during Fall of 2000, Mr. Allen had come out as being sexually abused by his Uncle as a pre teen, on more then 1 occasion. Events surrounding the divorce had brought this all back to Mr. Allen who as then in his early 30’s and when Demaris Allen-Mierl (Greg’s natural Mother) walked in on the forced oral sex when Greg was a boy, it went unreported and therefore covered up by the Allen family. Within a few years after that Mr. Allen’s Father had an affair and the natural parents divorced, Father married the other woman & that also went pretty much unexplained to the boy and then the man’s life. Although Mr. Greg Allen does point out that he hated this woman in the past. He states that he did not quite understand what had happened, perhaps an indication of his Mother’s attempted alienation of Greg’s Father. Mr. Allen was observed by Dr. David Pool as rubbing his hand nervously over his mouth from time to time as he spoke of emotionally sensitive matters during the interview. That is important due to the nature of the young boy's type of abuse, it's typically clinically telling of unprocessed emotions and feelings. Mr. Allen’s sexual history also surfaced in other ways; during Rorschach testing he made the male the victim in a cheating situation, with the woman in the role of cheater naked, shamed and still in bed. He then pointed out that they do “Mom & Dad type of things” when speaking to an adult. Although his parents choose to cover up the abuse that took place for approximately 5 years, they never addressed it with the growing boy. It seemed to have left a void of doubt and confusion while the boy developed. Dr. Poole then goes on to note that “he apparently is not aware of such emotions, save when they crop up in the context of immediate conflict IE “dropping a television in anger”. He does not appear insightful about what drew him to his wife in the first place or what went wrong in the marriage, other than refer in general terms to his wife’s shortcomings. The testing also indicates that he is not generally attuned to his emotions and their sources… In addition, he appears to have trouble assessing and acknowledging his own emotional reactions to events. It was evident in the testing and also in the interview that he was not able to relate his wife's reactions to anything that he was doing. That typically means (there is limited information & these observations are speculative at best) empathy and emotional understanding are lacking causing a person to "go too far" in reacting to different situations.
During the sentencing hearing, multiple people testified about seeing the 3 year old advanced sexualized behavior, red & raw labia, simulating sex with a balloon, making moves on males that alarmed the witness. One of the defendant’s witnesses had seen the child at age 3 (during separation) constantly want to play make believe in the wife/Mom role that involved a lot of petting, caressing and tongue kissing and the behavior had seen on multiple occasions. Another witness then testified that; at the time Greg Allen was determined to get the child away from Llorens, that she didn’t have any money being a stay at home Mom & he “it was just like.. it was just being pounded on her.” She had asked him (at the time)“why not just wait the 3 months and let her get her degree” She also testified that the child at age 3 had taken a long balloon (the type you twist to make a flower or animal with) and had reclined onto her back spreading her legs open and started simulating sex with that long animal balloon. Yet another witness had noted the child’s red and swollen labia upon the child’s return to Llorens on multiple custody exchanges, the child was still in diapers on and off at this time (mostly overnights & it's common that the stress of a high conflict divorce causes a child to regress behaviorally). The investigating CPS agent Holly Parks testified that 9 reports had been called in during 1 month time surrounding severe bruising about the eyes & face, most of these reports came from therapists, medical personnel, neutral exchange personnel & other mandatory reporters. Ms. Parks goes on to explain that a verdict of “ruled out” means only that no outcry was made, not that it didn’t happen. Ms. Parks also testified that Llorens stated on record that “I don’t think he’s necessarily abusing her, I don’t think he’s watching her enough” Ms. Parks goes onto verify that she spoke with Mr. Allen about making sure the child is being supervised closely and verifies that CPS was aware of the prior domestic violence in the marriage between the couple. CPS had strongly suggested that the child go to the hospital after approximately 5 weeks of different face and eye injuries
At the time of the divorce Mr. Allen was pushing for jail for enforcement with things as simple as picking up the child early from daycare on Llorens’ day. It was apparent that both parties were engaging in raw emotions & pushing each other’s buttons by playing dirty. One with and one without money, Allen who had blown off spousal support & filed for child support before Llorens had graduated school while finding a new residence, facing an entry level salary in her field. Which brings us back to, it’s 2017 & he’s allegedly still stealing her mail and tampering with her life, and you know what? He potentially profited off of it, through local fundraisers, gofundme and more. People don’t flee the country for no reason, people don’t still steal their ex’s mail, 17 years after divorce unless the behavior was a successful tool to control, dominate & terrorize an individual (in typical domestic violence cases).
We ask that people do not harass this young woman who has had a non traditional upbringing, yet Mom was able to keep her in school, dance classes & community gatherings and festivals during their time in Mexico.
After we had cooperated with Mr. Allen, it's been found out that Allen has been blowing up everyone's phone & attempting to portray Ms. Llorens as being in violation of parole. This would put Ms. Llorens back behind bars. On Ms. Llorens window on a borrowed car was shattered (but intact) we can't prove who did it but timing, pattern and behavior seem to fit the alleged profile. Although again, we do not have proof of who it was nor have a background in criminal forensics.