Texas Family Code Sec. 156.005. FRIVOLOUS FILING OF SUIT FOR MODIFICATION. Notwithstanding Rules 296 through 299
Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, if the court finds that a suit for modification is filed frivolously or is designed to harass a party, the court shall state that finding in the order and assess attorney's fees as costs against the offending party.
So what does this mean? Some parents will specifically file in order to limit or end child support, alimony or to start the path towards alienation. Strangely, these parties will spend tens & hundreds of thousands in order to get out of paying 10-30% to the former stay at home parent in order to stabilize the household for the children. Those target parents (who are used to being abused & brutalized by their former partner) were groomed using a deadly combination of techniques including; gas lighting, emotional abuse, domination, control, and constant reinforcing of the perception of inadequacy, humiliation, physical abuse, intimidation or whatever the controlling parent chooses.
Turning a case around is an art, I know how to help.
Case Review - Sylvia Plath
Sylvia Plath was a poet & anyone familiar with her story knows that it's widely accepted that her husband, poet & Knight, Ted Hughes who profited greatly after Plath's death & gained his knighthood due to editing Plath's work. Anyone familiar with Plath knew that she was being abused and gas lighted by her husband, nobody did anything to intervene. Plath was pushed to the point of breaking and then suicide, the public world branded her as being "crazy" and "unstable" but the work is now no longer edited to hide the truth.
Check out the Literary Hub review of her life & current editions of her work.
Change. org - Judge Tim Sulak has a lengthy history of conducting himself in a dishonest and discriminatory manner. Additionally, he has engaged in a pattern of discrimination against vulnerable parents in a manner that puts domestic violence survivors and their children at risk for abuse. Judge Sulak has repeatedly ignored the abuse dynamic in cases before him and has demonstrated a willingness to engaged in ex parte communication and receive ex parte evidence to justify his actions.
In one case, a mother was raped by her abusive ex-partner after Judge Tim Sulak declined to recognize an out of state protective order. In another case, Judge Tim Sulak expressly stated from the bench that addressing gender discrimination in cases before him was outside of his jurisdiction. In yet another case, Judge Tim Sulak told a mother that if her child made an outcry of abuse during his interview with the child, he would just assume that the mother was coaching the child.
This type of behavior simply cannot be tolerated from a member of our prestigious judiciary. Please join us by signing our Petition to Impeach Judge Tim Sulak, and let your state Representative know that Texas still cares about judicial integrity.
July 18th, 2017
Case Review - Dara Llorens
UPDATE - This story has been removed, due to the actions of Ms. Llorens, who received FREE services from this site regarding her case and chose to repay that with claiming authorship of this article and site. When she was asked directly, she misled us multiple times and is now and has been attempting to smear the owner of this site. Due to her current actions, this statement had to be crafted to protect this site & it's owner from potential slander or lawsuits created by her version of events. At this time we are unable to take additional funding. If you have any questions, complaints or comments about this or need to verify authorship or employment please email us at; email@example.com
It is with a grave heart that I post this I understand how Llorens operates, attempting to smear me to anyone who’ll listen. She typically escalates based on how much sympathy, reinforcement & effort she gets out of people around her. I write this to protect my reputation, her future targets and hopefully not cause duress to the unintended. Make no mistake, this is cold move. After hearing this happen to others that Llorens had “finished” with and understanding the potential pattern. I do not have a choice in this matter but to respond to these repeated allegations of hers. My personal apologies are offered to all affected in this matter. If she wasn’t after my credit, my work, my reputation and potentially my identification and so much more I wouldn’t have taken the article down in the first place. Her manipulative actions with multiple parties has brought her entire case under scrutiny, which is why she’ll have a hard time correcting it with the State of Texas.
Family Law related research by non lawyers